Jane Austen Book Club – Sense & Sensibility Discussion Qs

What was your favorite moment of the book?

One of my favorite moments of Sense and Sensibility is in chapter 30 when Mrs. Jennings is checking on Marianne after her heartbreak, and offering olives. She says, “Well, poor thing! I won’t disturb her any longer, for she had better have her cry out at once and have done with.” And I just think that is the funniest and truest line ever. Cry it out, Marianne!

The working title of the book was Elinor and Marianne. Why is Sense and Sensibility a better title? In what ways do Elinore and Marianne embody these traits?

I would categorize Elinor and Marriane as dual heroines, and changing the title to S&S broadens the themes of the book. Typically Elinor is seen as the sensible one, and Marianne the sensitive one. But one of the interesting things about this book is how they do a switch, and by the end of the book Elinor is able to touch into her emotions in a way she wasn’t able to before, and Marianne makes much better choices, and shows more sense, which she was lacking at first. So this title change is important because it alludes to the sister’s transformations and dual nature, which I think everyone can relate to. We, all of us, have dual natures, a little bit of sense and a little bit of sensibility!

Margaret is often the overlooked younger sister in this novel–what do you think of her role in this novel?

Margaret Dashwood is mentioned sparsely throughout novel. Her character appears to be minor, existing as a particular supportive element for the her sisters. All her life depends on the events related to the members of her family, and she can not wait to live it by herself and feel all the patience of the independent existence.

What did you think about Willoughby’s apology? Did you feel sympathetic towards him?

I have very unsympathetic feelings toward Willoughby. He seems like a fuckboi and I just don’t like him.

What did you think of Lucy Steele? Did you trust her at first, or were you suspicious of her eagerness to befriend Elinor?

I personally do not trust Lucy Steele. There are moments where she seems to be intentionally petty, and I her keeping secret engagements makes her even less likeable.

Chapter 23 highlights her scheming character traits best, in my opinion. She is seen offering pointed information that Elinor hasn’t explicitly asked for, suggesting that Lucy is purposely choosing what to tell Elinor, and illuminates her pushing Elinor for information in an artful way.

In the end, Lucy gets what she wants—a wealthy husband who allows her to move up the social ladder through marriage. As the narrator says of her at the conclusion of the novel, she is a prime example of what someone can achieve when he or she is persistent, self-interested, and determined.

How do secrets drive Marianne and Elinor’s actions?

Secrets have a lot of power in the novel, both kept secrets and secrets revealed. 

CH 23 — “The necessity of concealing from her mother and Marianne, what had been entrusted in confidence to herself, though it obliged her to unceasing exertion, was no aggravation of Elinor’s distress.”

CH 29 — “Nor I,” answered Marianne with energy, “our situations then are alike. We have neither of us any thing to tell; you, because you do not communicate, and I, because I conceal nothing.”

Which sister seems to change the most over the course of the novel? Who would you say is the heroine of the story, or do they share the role equally? 

Elinor and Marianne’s characters both show great development and growth by the end of the book. Typically Elinor is seen as representing sense and Marianne as representing Sensibility throughout the novel, but as the novel goes on, the heroines are able to learn from each other and that drives their characters’ evolution. By the end, Elinor has learned to be more sensible, and Marianne has learned to be more sensical, and that is one of the greatest journeys: learning that it is okay to be a little bit of both.

If I had to choose, I would say Elinor is the heroine of the story, in the same way that Lizzy is the heroine of P&P. P&P presents a story where the heroines are lifted up from poverty to wealth, marry rich handsome gentlemen, and get to marry for love. S&S presents more of a story about choices–both sisters marry, but Elinor gets her man in the end because she makes more rational choices from point A to B. Marianne loses her first choice because of her desperate actions, poor decision-making, and lack of foresight. She marries a good man in the end, but unlike Elinor, she ends up with her second-choice after incredible suffering and heartbreak. It makes her a stronger character, but it is much less idealized than the HEA of P&P.

How would you compare/contrast P&P to S&S? How are they similar, and how are they different?

Ofc P&P is still my favorite, but it’s always interesting to go through her other works and read them closer. I have to say that I do see a lot of similarities between P&P/S&S—even the titles stand out as the most similar of her stories. However, while Pride and Prejudice leans more towards a fantasy HEA, Sense and Sensibility presents a much more realistic (albeit cynical) take on love.

Jane Austen Book Club – Pride & Prejudice Discussion Qs

Pride and Prejudice is my personal favorite—and, arguably the most favorited of all Jane Austen’s novels—so I thought I would start there. Pride & Prejudice is one of the most loved and widely adapted of Austen’s works. Since it was first published in 1813, Jane Austen’s Pride and Prejudice has sold over 20 million copies, and is now one of the most recognizable names in British literature. Though it was written over 200 years ago, it remains relevant. Not only is it a beautifully written love story with a happy ending, but it contains timeless insights about human nature that reminds readers that first impressions can often be wrong.

Discussion Questions to think about while reading Pride and Prejudice:

What are some themes in the story? How do they relate to the plot and characters?

What was your favorite moment of the book? What is your least favorite?

The working title of the book was First Impressions. Why is Pride and Prejudice a better title? In what ways are Darcy and Elizabeth guilty of both pride and prejudice and how does this drive the action of the story?

Marriage, as something to be aspired to, is portrayed quite differently in the novel than in existing marriages. What married couples do we see in the novel? How would you characterize these relationships?

Two central characters in Jane Austen’s works have her own first name. In Pride and Prejudice, Jane Bennet is described as “everything lovely.” In Emma, Jane Fairfax’s character is described as a “decorous, talented, beautiful woman.” What do you make of that?

Do you find the characters likable? Are the characters people you would want to meet?

Is Elizabeth Bennet consistent in her actions? Is she a fully developed character? How so?

How essential is the setting to the story? Could the story have taken place anywhere else? What makes this novel “timeless”?

My responses:

What are some themes in the story? How do they relate to the plot and characters?

Some of the themes in the book center around the idea of love versus the institution of marriage, the expectations placed on women, social class and status, as well as manners and integrity.

What was your favorite moment of the book? What is your least favorite?

One of my favorite moments of the book is when Lizzy realizes her love for Darcy. “I do, I do like him,” she replied, with tears in her eyes; “I love him.” And then she goes on to say how she was so wrong about him, and I just think it is such a beautiful moment of self-realization and romance.

Another favorite is Caroline’s quote on libraries: How much sooner one tires of any thing than of a book! — When I have a house of my own, I shall be miserable if I have not an excellent library.”

One of my least favorite moments is when Charlotte Lucas marries Mr. Collins. It just doesn’t sit right with me that she took Lizzy’s leftovers. Another low is everything about the slimy f-boy rake Mr. Wickham.

The working title of the book was First Impressions. Why is Pride and Prejudice a better title? In what ways are Darcy and Elizabeth guilty of both pride and prejudice and how does this drive the action of the story?

First Impressions was a great working title because it captures the essence of the story, but I think using the words Pride and Prejudice helps to narrow it down even more. Lizzy and Darcy’s first impressions of each other were wrong because of their pride and their prejudice, and they are given the space to work through their misunderstandings and reevaluate their first impressions. There are many times throughout the book that various characters are very judgy in general, and I think that also plays into pride and prejudices in a way. Also, both Lizzy and Darcy show signs of being prideful and prejudiced at various times throughout the book, though traditionally Darcy is aligned with Pride and Lizzy is meant to be Prejudice.

Marriage, as something to be aspired to, is portrayed quite differently in the novel than in existing marriages. What married couples do we see in the novel? How would you characterize these relationships?

I would categorize most of the married relationships in the novel as unhappy, or lacking in some way. My personal favorite couple is Mr. and Mrs. Bennet, I just think their toxic dynamic so so hilarious. I think this is Austen’s way of poking fun at the institution of marriage. She herself remained unmarried while all or most of her main characters get HEAs. This seems a bit satirical and ironic to me, that a woman who wrote about characters who strive toward the ideal of marriage did not actually practice what she preached. 

It also has always left me wondering about her own relationships. Some scholars have speculated about Jane’s love life, and some theories suggest she was jilted by the love of her life, Tom Lefoy. But there is no concrete evidence and it is just a fan theory that I frequently wonder about.

Two central characters in Jane Austen’s works have her own first name. In Pride and Prejudice, Jane Bennet is described as “everything lovely.” In Emma, Jane Fairfax’s character is described as a “decorous, talented, beautiful woman.” What do you make of that?

I find it hilarious that Jane had a habit of naming her most talented and beautiful characters after herself! 

Do you find the characters likable? Are the characters people you would want to meet?

Some of the characters I find very likeable, and I would still like to meet some of the unlikeable characters just because they bring so much drama to a room!

Is Elizabeth Bennet consistent in her actions? Is she a fully developed character? How so?

I would categorize Elizabeth Bennet as a bit inconsistent, actually. I think she is written with flaws, as are most of the characters, and given room to grow, which is important to her character arc. By the end of the novel she has had time to change her mind on certain things, and the fact that she is a character who can admit her mistakes and learn from them makes her a strong character.

How essential is the setting to the story? Could the story have taken place anywhere else? What makes this novel “timeless”?

Though it was written over 200 years ago, Pride and Prejudice remains relevant today. Not only is it a beautifully written love story with a happy ending, but it contains timeless insights about human nature that reminds readers that first impressions can often be wrong. There have been countless adaptations of this story that continue to borrow the enemy-to-lovers trope, because it is an age-old idea that is universal. 

Human nature hasn’t changed much in 200 years, and we are all just Standing On The Shoulders Of Giants and recycling the same Seven Basic Plots. Reinterpreting their ideas and making them modern isn’t a new idea. Literature has always been intertextual – writers have forever been influenced by other writers. We are all only standing on the shoulders of giants, and the fact that Jane Austen’s books are still discussed, read, reworked and adapted 200 years later just proves the timelessness of her writing.